From owner-dq@dq.sf.org.nz Fri Jan 29 02:23:31 1999 Received: (from bin@localhost) by mail.sf.org.nz (8.8.6/NZSFI-19980830) id CAA14438; Fri, 29 Jan 1999 02:23:31 +1300 Received: from smtp1.ihug.co.nz (tk1.ihug.co.nz [203.29.160.13]) by mail.sf.org.nz (8.8.6/NZSFI-19980830) with ESMTP id CAA14431 ; Fri, 29 Jan 1999 02:23:29 +1300 Received: from phaeton.ihug.co.nz (p59-max40.akl.ihug.co.nz [203.109.228.251]) by smtp1.ihug.co.nz (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id PAA05064 ; Fri, 29 Jan 1999 15:09:43 +1300 Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19990129150915.0080ed10@pop.ihug.co.nz> X-Sender: phaeton@pop.ihug.co.nz X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 15:09:15 +1300 Subject: Re: Bardic et al Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" From: Keith Smith To: dq@dq.sf.org.nz Sender: owner-dq@dq.sf.org.nz Errors-To: owner-dq@dq.sf.org.nz Reply-To: dq@dq.sf.org.nz X-Loop: dq@dq.sf.org.nz X-Requests: To unsubscribe from this list, or change your subscription address, send a message to dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz. >>From the safe distance of London I remember that troubled Guild session >where the great hesitation ensued. One of the conditions of the probabition >was that at the end of it a vote would be taken to either > >1) remove the college >2) accept the college in as written >3) accept the college with modifications > >Now I remember that removing the college had certain conditions but I >can't remember if we decided that characters would have the option of >respending their EP or going down a black hole. I do remember though >that the axe was always poised about the character's head that the >college could be trashed and the players didn't have any room to >weasel about it. From what I can see in the minutes the probationary clause was amended to allow the refunding to time and EP to players if their College was dropped (June '97) Keith (phaeton@ihug.co.nz) -- See message headers to unsubscribe from --