Re Binder
Not m,uch progress has been made on the re-write. I intend to have a discussion
version ready by the end of September at the latest. Apologies for delayus due
to work commitments and other matters.
Scott
If anybody has any ideas other than burn/destroy/get rid of them I would be
interested in looking at them.
Errol Cavit wrote:
> >From: ross.alexander@uk.neceur.com Sent: Wednesday, 1 August 2001 00:53
> >Hi Errol,
> >
> >The only issues I can see are the status of Binder and Rune. Are they
> >going anywhere
> >in a hurry or should be just leave them as is.
> >
> >Cheers,
> >
> >Ross
>
> OK folks, two issues here
>
> I. Rune
> Apparently, people were being discouraged / prevented from starting new Rune
> characters, as a new version was 'imminent'. Nothing special in regards to
> this status made it to the June 2000 rulebook. I take it we can announce
> this concept (that several people have mentioned to me) as dead?
>
> I understand that there are a very few 'playtesting' a revised college. What
> happens to these (this?) characters?
>
> II. Binder (see quotes at end of post)
> Probationary until April 2001. We need to decide what happens now. I suggest
> a discussion on-list immediately (say over the next week) feel free to pass
> on comments from anyone who doesn't read the list). Hopefully we can come to
> a consensus, and update the rulebook (errata) that will be out at the next
> Guild Meeting accordingly. Confirm decision by vote at Guild Meeting.
>
> Cheers
> Errol
>
> [From April 1999 god's meeting]
> 2) Statuses of Probationary Colleges.
> It was noted that if any of the colleges are voted out that characters
> playing those colleges get their time and EP back for reinvestment. Note:
> All voting in order (Pass/Abstain/Fail)
>
> ii) Binder
> What was the theme of this College? The cosensus was Enchanting Objects.
> Should we extend E&E or keep Binder. Binder was perceived to be a good idea
> but still needs work. Golems were currently seen to be a problem. It was
> reported that Scott has offered to do a version of the College that doesn't
> have golems. The question was asked 'Should people who have characters in a
> College be working on that College?' It was decided if they want to, let
> them.
> Keep the College in any form (7/3/4)
> Upgrade the College to full status from probationary (4/1/8)
>
> [From June 2000 Rulebook, Binder college intro]
> This College is a probationary College. This
> means that this College is under trial for two years
> (as of April 1999). All characters that join this
> College do so under the understanding that if this
> College is deemed unplayable, it may be with-drawn
> or radically changed. At that point, all
> such characters may have the EP and time spent
> in this College refunded, to be re-spent freely in
> another College as if that College had been their
> original choice.
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>
> -- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz --
-- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz --
|