Subject[dq] Undetectability II - way forward
Fromecavit@tranzrail.co.nz
DateFri, 15 Feb 2002 12:05:46 +1300
Hi folks

We now have a reasonable collection of people's thoughts on what qualities
are wanted, but we haven't have much progress since the start of the week.

Would it be useful to have someone try to gather together these thoughts
into say 3 different outline proposals, to see what workable combinations
appear? Each option would of course be a set of compromises, as not
everybody's preferred qualities will work together.

Any better ideas on how to progress? Any volunteers?

Cheers
Errol


-- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz --

SubjectRe: [dq] Undetectability II - way forward
Frommandos@iconz.net
DateFri, 15 Feb 2002 12:10:38 +1300
> We now have a reasonable collection of people's thoughts on what qualities
> are wanted, but we haven't have much progress since the start of the week.
>
> Would it be useful to have someone try to gather together these thoughts
> into say 3 different outline proposals, to see what workable combinations
> appear? Each option would of course be a set of compromises, as not
> everybody's preferred qualities will work together.
>
> Any better ideas on how to progress? Any volunteers?

Another possible next step would also be to get people to rank them in order
of importance and weight a solution to the more requested features.

Mandos
/s


-- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz --