Subject | [dq] Undetectability II - way forward |
---|---|
From | ecavit@tranzrail.co.nz |
Date | Fri, 15 Feb 2002 12:05:46 +1300 |
Hi folks We now have a reasonable collection of people's thoughts on what qualities are wanted, but we haven't have much progress since the start of the week. Would it be useful to have someone try to gather together these thoughts into say 3 different outline proposals, to see what workable combinations appear? Each option would of course be a set of compromises, as not everybody's preferred qualities will work together. Any better ideas on how to progress? Any volunteers? Cheers Errol -- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz -- |
Subject | Re: [dq] Undetectability II - way forward |
---|---|
From | mandos@iconz.net |
Date | Fri, 15 Feb 2002 12:10:38 +1300 |
> We now have a reasonable collection of people's thoughts on what qualities > are wanted, but we haven't have much progress since the start of the week. > > Would it be useful to have someone try to gather together these thoughts > into say 3 different outline proposals, to see what workable combinations > appear? Each option would of course be a set of compromises, as not > everybody's preferred qualities will work together. > > Any better ideas on how to progress? Any volunteers? Another possible next step would also be to get people to rank them in order of importance and weight a solution to the more requested features. Mandos /s -- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz -- |