Eamon Zink is also prepared to run a game and when he come out of his room
I'll get his email address of him.

William


-- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-announce-request@dq.sf.org.nz --

I am also short an adventure.


-- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz --

Just as another small point in this somewhat pointless debate.

Are people aware that Thieves are only able to climb manmade objects at the
moment?

Quoted from the current rules.

> A thief can, as long as they may find a purchase
> sufficient to bear their weight, climb any structure.
> The success chance when climbing on a structure not
> made for that purpose is (4 × MD + 10 × Rank) -
> (Structure Height in Feet / 10)%. Round the structure
> height down. If the GM’s roll is greater than the success
> percentage, the thief has fallen in climbing the
> structure. To determine the height at which the thief
> falls, roll D100. Round the number off to the nearest
> 10% (a roll of 5 is rounded down), and multiply the
> height the thief sought to attain by that percentage.
> See §29.1 for falling damage.

Hmmm constant referals to "Structures" and "structures not made for". Are
people anooyed by the current climbing rules or are people simply not
bothering to read them?

Mandos
/s


-- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz --

does this make it nine without an adventure?

I too would like an adventure = 10, but I am only aware of my probable
whereabouts for three weeks (approximately coinciding with Christmas-New
Year).

Does anyone wish an 'intense' game over January?

Ian

----- Original Message -----
From: <michael.woodhams@peace.com>
To: <dq@dq.sf.org.nz>
Sent: Tuesday, 10 December 2002 09:19
Subject: Re: [dq] Session Required


> I am also short an adventure.
>
>
> -- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz --
>


-- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz --