------=_Part_18220_23830509.1128737031334
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
With Multiple Image we get the best stacking defense spell there is. At Ran=
k
12 it provides at guaranteed single target 75% defence.
The only problem I usually have with being an illusionist is the little
stuff as Mark Simpson said. Believable chests, fires, flags, flowers. I
wouldn't mind a resist for half damage spell but feel that is a valid
weakness of the college.
Like many colleges it take imagination to play a low/med illusionist and
only a little less to play a high one (But then I'm not sure, Gerald isn't
really a high yet)
TTFN, Struan
On 10/7/05, Simpson@smtp.sig.net.nz <Simpson@smtp.sig.net.nz> wrote:
>
> I always got frustrated as an illusionist that you couldnt just "do"
> simple illusions. If I want to do an illusion of a chest sitting in the
> middle of the floor it would look like a chest made by a rank zero crafts=
man
> (think Homer Simpson homemade quality), because the spell says the object
> appears as an object made by a rank/3 craftsman or something like that. I
> have to rank this spell above 10 just to have a "real" looking chest? ...
> arrggggghhh.
> When you think about it the most useful spells in any college can often
> come down to:
> 1. Buffing spells - Stat buffs, Defence buffs, weapon buffs, armour
> buffs, lesser Enchantment, cold protection, vapour breathing etc. -
> illusionist get an underpowered defence spell (1+1 per rank special
> knowledge from memory);
> 2. Damage spells - illusionists get a very underwhelming bolt
> 3. Transport spells - nope
> 4. Non damage based "Take down" spells (eg sleep, mental attack, agony?,
> charm etc.) - Maze spell - not bad but not entirely amazing either - Flas=
h
> of light.
> 5. Healing spells - nope
> 6. General Utility Spells - Enhance enchantment, Mind Speech, Lesser
> Enchantment, Cold Protection, Feather fall etc. - Disguise Illusion and
> Illusionary terrian - illusionists are reasonably well served here.
> The one area I'd focus on first is giving Illusionists a good defence
> spell. They are meant to be masters of deceiving the eye, they should be
> hard to hit, so why not give them a top line defence spell. What about a =
2+2
> per rank spell which gives nothing in close or only 1+1 (once you got hol=
d
> of the slimey blighters it should easier to nail them) but 3 per rank vs
> missiles? Also why not tweak their version of invis to give some addition=
al
> benefit/spice over the E&E version?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* dq-owner@dq.sf.org.nz [mailto:dq-owner@dq.sf.org.nz]*On Behalf Of
> *Andrew Withy (DSL AK)
> *Sent:* Friday, 7 October 2005 9:57 a.m.
> *To:* dq@dq.sf.org.nz
> *Subject:* Re: [dq] Specialists
>
> Bards are rare PCs in DQ. Illusionists are more common. If Illusionists
> are crippled, why? Presumably the college is not tough enough, or badly
> focussed, or something? I think the college needs more work (some people =
say
> bring back the old Illusion college). If Illusionists are broken, they ca=
n
> be fixed.
> As a player, I've not found Illusion to be crippling, but then I don't
> play a low/medium illusionist. It's just not (a) blast; (b) boost; (c)
> transport. As a GM, Illusion (old or new) is really tough.
> Andrew
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* dq-owner@dq.sf.org.nz [mailto:dq-owner@dq.sf.org.nz] *On Behalf O=
f
> *Martin Dickson
> *Sent:* Friday, 7 October 2005 9:44 a.m.
> *To:* dq@dq.sf.org.nz
> *Subject:* Re: [dq] Specialists
>
> On 10/7/05, Stephen Martin <stephenm@castle.pointclark.net> wrote:
> >
> > ...Bards and Illusionists are crippled...
>
>
> Not often enough. Some are merely maimed.
>
>
>
------=_Part_18220_23830509.1128737031334
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
<div>With Multiple Image we get the best stacking defense spell there is. A=
t Rank 12 it provides at guaranteed single target 75% defence.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The only problem I usually have with being an illusionist is the littl=
e stuff as Mark Simpson said. Believable chests, fires, flags, flowers. I w=
ouldn't mind a resist for half damage spell but feel that is a valid weakne=
ss of the college.
</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Like many colleges it take imagination to play a low/med illusionist a=
nd only a little less to play a high one (But then I'm not sure, Gerald isn=
't really a high yet)</div>
<div> </div>
<div>TTFN, Struan<br><br> </div>
<div><span class=3D"gmail_quote">On 10/7/05, <b class=3D"gmail_sendername">=
<a href=3D"mailto:Simpson@smtp.sig.net.nz">Simpson@smtp.sig.net.nz</a></b> =
<<a href=3D"mailto:Simpson@smtp.sig.net.nz">Simpson@smtp.sig.net.nz</a>&=
gt; wrote:
</span>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0=
px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">
<div><span><font face=3D"Arial" color=3D"#0000ff" size=3D"2">I always got f=
rustrated as an illusionist that you couldnt just "do" simple ill=
usions. If I want to do an illusion of a chest sitting in the middle of the=
floor it would look like a chest made by a rank zero craftsman (think Home=
r Simpson homemade quality), because the spell says the object appears as a=
n object made by a rank/3 craftsman or something like that. I have to=
rank this spell above 10 just to have a "real" looking chest? &n=
bsp;... arrggggghhh.=20
</font></span></div>
<div><span><font face=3D"Arial" color=3D"#0000ff" size=3D"2"></font></span>=
</div>
<div><span><font face=3D"Arial" color=3D"#0000ff" size=3D"2">When you think=
about it the most useful spells in any college can often come down to:</fo=
nt></span></div>
<div><span><font face=3D"Arial" color=3D"#0000ff" size=3D"2"></font></span>=
</div>
<div><span><font face=3D"Arial" color=3D"#0000ff" size=3D"2">1. Buffin=
g spells - Stat buffs, Defence buffs, weapon buffs, armour buffs, less=
er Enchantment, cold protection, vapour breathing etc. - illusionist =
get an underpowered defence spell (1+1 per rank special knowledge from memo=
ry);
</font></span></div>
<div><span><font face=3D"Arial" color=3D"#0000ff" size=3D"2">2. Damage spel=
ls - illusionists get a very underwhelming bolt</font></span></div>
<div><span><font face=3D"Arial" color=3D"#0000ff" size=3D"2">3. Transport s=
pells - nope</font></span></div>
<div><span><font face=3D"Arial" color=3D"#0000ff" size=3D"2">4. Non damage =
based "Take down" spells (eg sleep, mental attack, agony?, c=
harm etc.) - Maze spell - not bad but not entirely amazing either - Flash o=
f light.
</font></span></div>
<div><span><font face=3D"Arial" color=3D"#0000ff" size=3D"2">5. Healing spe=
lls - nope</font></span></div>
<div><span><font face=3D"Arial" color=3D"#0000ff" size=3D"2">6. General Uti=
lity Spells - Enhance enchantment, Mind Speech, Lesser Enchantment, Cold Pr=
otection, Feather fall etc. - Disguise Illusion and Illusionary terrian - i=
llusionists are reasonably well served here.=20
</font></span></div>
<div><span><font face=3D"Arial" color=3D"#0000ff" size=3D"2"></font></span>=
</div>
<div><font face=3D"Arial"><font size=3D"2"><font color=3D"#0000ff"><span>Th=
e one area I'd focus on first is giving Illusionists a good defence spell. =
They are meant to be masters of deceiving the eye, they should be hard to h=
it, so why not give them a top line defence spell. What about a 2+2 per ran=
k spell which gives nothing in close or only 1+1 (once you got hold o=
f the slimey blighters it should easier to nail them) but 3 per r=
ank vs missiles? Also why not tweak their version of invis to give some add=
itional benefit/spice over the E&E version?
</span></font></font></font></div>
<div><span class=3D"e" id=3D"q_106c7dca4732a2f9_1">
<div><span><font face=3D"Arial" color=3D"#0000ff" size=3D"2"></font></span>=
</div>
<blockquote dir=3D"ltr" style=3D"MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<div dir=3D"ltr" align=3D"left"><font face=3D"Tahoma" size=3D"2">-----Origi=
nal Message-----<br><b>From:</b> <a onclick=3D"return top.js.OpenExtLink(wi=
ndow,event,this)" href=3D"mailto:dq-owner@dq.sf.org.nz" target=3D"_blank">d=
q-owner@dq.sf.org.nz
</a> [mailto:<a onclick=3D"return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" hr=
ef=3D"mailto:dq-owner@dq.sf.org.nz" target=3D"_blank">dq-owner@dq.sf.org.nz=
</a>]<b>On Behalf Of </b>Andrew Withy (DSL AK)<br><b>Sent:</b> Friday, 7 Oc=
tober 2005 9:57=20
a.m.<br><b>To:</b> <a onclick=3D"return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,thi=
s)" href=3D"mailto:dq@dq.sf.org.nz" target=3D"_blank">dq@dq.sf.org.nz</a><b=
r><b>Subject:</b> Re: [dq] Specialists<br><br></font></div>
<div><font face=3D"Arial" color=3D"#0000ff" size=3D"2"><span>Bards are rare=
PCs in DQ. Illusionists are more common. If Illusionists are crippled, why=
? Presumably the college is not tough enough, or badly focussed, or somethi=
ng? I think the college needs more work (some people say bring back the old=
Illusion college). If Illusionists are broken, they can be fixed.
</span></font></div>
<div><font face=3D"Arial" color=3D"#0000ff" size=3D"2"><span></span></font>=
</div>
<div><font face=3D"Arial" color=3D"#0000ff" size=3D"2"><span>As a player, I=
've not found Illusion to be crippling, but then I don't play a low/medium =
illusionist. It's just not (a) blast; (b) boost; (c) transport. As a GM, Il=
lusion (old or new) is really tough.
</span></font></div>
<div><font face=3D"Arial" color=3D"#0000ff" size=3D"2"><span></span></font>=
</div>
<div><font face=3D"Arial" color=3D"#0000ff" size=3D"2"><span>Andrew</span><=
/font></div>
<blockquote style=3D"MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<div></div>
<div lang=3D"en-us" dir=3D"ltr" align=3D"left"><font face=3D"Tahoma" size=
=3D"2">-----Original Message-----<br><b>From:</b> <a onclick=3D"return top.=
js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href=3D"mailto:dq-owner@dq.sf.org.nz" ta=
rget=3D"_blank">
dq-owner@dq.sf.org.nz</a> [mailto:<a onclick=3D"return top.js.OpenExtLink(w=
indow,event,this)" href=3D"mailto:dq-owner@dq.sf.org.nz" target=3D"_blank">=
dq-owner@dq.sf.org.nz</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Martin Dickson<br><b>Sent:</=
b>
Friday, 7 October 2005 9:44 a.m.<br><b>To:</b> <a onclick=3D"return top.js=
.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href=3D"mailto:dq@dq.sf.org.nz" target=3D"=
_blank">dq@dq.sf.org.nz</a><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [dq] Specialists<br><br>=
</font>
</div>On 10/7/05, <b class=3D"gmail_sendername">Stephen Martin</b> <<a o=
nclick=3D"return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href=3D"mailto:step=
henm@castle.pointclark.net" target=3D"_blank">stephenm@castle.pointclark.ne=
t</a>
> wrote:=20
<div><span class=3D"gmail_quote"></span>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0pt 0=
pt 0pt 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(204,204,204) 1px solid">...Bards and Illusio=
nists are crippled...</blockquote>
<div><br>Not often enough. Some are merely maimed. <br> </div><b=
r> </div><br></blockquote></blockquote></span></div></blockquote></div=
><br>
------=_Part_18220_23830509.1128737031334--
-- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz --
|