SubjectRe: [dq] Which Rune version for rulebook?
FromErrol Cavit
DateFri, 24 Mar 2006 11:31:16 +1200
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C64ED1.E1B3F8FC
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"

So, does anyone have an objection to just having a placeholder for Rune in
the Rulebook?

We definitely want at least that (as opposed to dropping it completely), as
the Counterspells are still available (and taught to Namers).

Is it worthwhile having playtest version 2.1.4 (or 2.1.5 if it's been
confirmed) in the Rulebook as a resource for non-playtesters that want to
see the kind of stuff Rune Mages can do? I suppose if a GM wants to have
some Rune wards lying about the place they can prepare what they want
available as general (or philosopher) knowledge in advance.

Cheers
Errol

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dq-owner@dq.sf.org.nz [mailto:dq-owner@dq.sf.org.nz]On Behalf Of
> Stephen Martin
> Sent: Wednesday, 15 March 2006 11:12
> To: dq@dq.sf.org.nz
> Subject: Re: [dq] Which Rune version for rulebook?
> 
> 
> 
> In essense, yes.
> 
> But my first preference is now:
> ...remove the college from the rules and leave a placeholder 
> stating 'The college is undergoing a
> rewrite and playtest, refer to the Wiki for the latest version.'
> 
> 

------_=_NextPart_001_01C64ED1.E1B3F8FC
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
5.5.2658.2">
<TITLE>RE: [dq] Which Rune version for rulebook?</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>So, does anyone have an objection to just having a =
placeholder for Rune in the Rulebook?</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>We definitely want at least that (as opposed to =
dropping it completely), as the Counterspells are still available (and =
taught to Namers).</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Is it worthwhile having playtest version 2.1.4 (or =
2.1.5 if it's been confirmed) in the Rulebook as a resource for =
non-playtesters that want to see the kind of stuff Rune Mages can do? I =
suppose if a GM wants to have some Rune wards lying about the place =
they can prepare what they want available as general (or philosopher) =
knowledge in advance.</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Cheers</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Errol</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>&gt; -----Original Message-----</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&gt; From: dq-owner@dq.sf.org.nz [<A =
HREF=3D"mailto:dq-owner@dq.sf.org.nz">mailto:dq-owner@dq.sf.org.nz</A>]O=
n Behalf Of</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&gt; Stephen Martin</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&gt; Sent: Wednesday, 15 March 2006 11:12</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&gt; To: dq@dq.sf.org.nz</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&gt; Subject: Re: [dq] Which Rune version for =
rulebook?</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&gt; </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&gt; </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&gt; </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&gt; In essense, yes.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&gt; </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&gt; But my first preference is now:</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&gt; ...remove the college from the rules and leave =
a placeholder </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&gt; stating 'The college is undergoing a</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&gt; rewrite and playtest, refer to the Wiki for the =
latest version.'</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&gt; </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&gt; </FONT>
</P>

</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C64ED1.E1B3F8FC--


-- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz --
SubjectRe: [dq] Which Rune version for rulebook?
Fromraro002@ec.auckland.ac.nz
DateFri, 24 Mar 2006 13:13:19 +1200
Quoting Errol Cavit <ecavit@tollnz.co.nz>:

> So, does anyone have an objection to just having a placeholder for Rune in
> the Rulebook?


Yes, I do. I see no reason to put a placeholding into the rulebook for Rune,
seeing as people may be running games and might need to use it as a reference.

That's what they're for.

Jim.


-- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz --
SubjectRe: [dq] Which Rune version for rulebook?
FromErrol Cavit
DateFri, 24 Mar 2006 13:23:09 +1200
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C64EE1.82AA303C
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"



> -----Original Message-----
> From: raro002@ec.auckland.ac.nz [mailto:raro002@ec.auckland.ac.nz]
> Sent: Friday, 24 March 2006 13:13
> To: dq@dq.sf.org.nz
> Subject: Re: [dq] Which Rune version for rulebook?
> 
> 
> Quoting Errol Cavit <ecavit@tollnz.co.nz>:
> 
> > So, does anyone have an objection to just having a 
> placeholder for Rune in
> > the Rulebook?
> 
> 
> Yes, I do. I see no reason to put a placeholding into the 
> rulebook for Rune,
> seeing as people may be running games and might need to use 
> it as a reference.
> 
> That's what they're for.

So you prefer the option I raised in my post to put the current playtest
version in?

Cheers
Errol

------_=_NextPart_001_01C64EE1.82AA303C
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
5.5.2658.2">
<TITLE>RE: [dq] Which Rune version for rulebook?</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<BR>
<BR>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>&gt; -----Original Message-----</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&gt; From: raro002@ec.auckland.ac.nz [<A =
HREF=3D"mailto:raro002@ec.auckland.ac.nz">mailto:raro002@ec.auckland.ac.=
nz</A>]</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&gt; Sent: Friday, 24 March 2006 13:13</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&gt; To: dq@dq.sf.org.nz</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&gt; Subject: Re: [dq] Which Rune version for =
rulebook?</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&gt; </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&gt; </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&gt; Quoting Errol Cavit =
&lt;ecavit@tollnz.co.nz&gt;:</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&gt; </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&gt; &gt; So, does anyone have an objection to just =
having a </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&gt; placeholder for Rune in</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&gt; &gt; the Rulebook?</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&gt; </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&gt; </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&gt; Yes, I do. I see no reason to put a =
placeholding into the </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&gt; rulebook for Rune,</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&gt; seeing as people may be running games and might =
need to use </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&gt; it as a reference.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&gt; </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>&gt; That's what they're for.</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>So you prefer the option I raised in my post to put =
the current playtest version in?</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Cheers</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Errol</FONT>
</P>

</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C64EE1.82AA303C--


-- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz --
SubjectRe: [dq] Which Rune version for rulebook?
FromJonathan Bean - TME
DateFri, 24 Mar 2006 13:23:07 +1200
I would like to have the most up to date version in the Rulebook.
I think version 2.1.5 is ready for 'general play test'. Yes I feel it is not
a great college but it fix's most (but not all) of the current issues with
Rune. I feel it is better that Rune 1.0 or 1.1 and 2.1.4

I want the Rule Book to have a version of Rune in it not just a placeholder
pointing to the DQ Wiki.

I want to be able to read a Rulebook away from the evils of a PC after 10
hours working on a PC at work, without having to print anything extra or
download something. Also I hate trees.

Jono

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dq-owner@dq.sf.org.nz [mailto:dq-owner@dq.sf.org.nz]On Behalf Of
> raro002@ec.auckland.ac.nz
> Sent: Friday, 24 March 2006 1:13 p.m.
> To: dq@dq.sf.org.nz
> Subject: Re: [dq] Which Rune version for rulebook?
>
>
> Quoting Errol Cavit <ecavit@tollnz.co.nz>:
>
> > So, does anyone have an objection to just having a placeholder
> for Rune in
> > the Rulebook?
>
>
> Yes, I do. I see no reason to put a placeholding into the
> rulebook for Rune,
> seeing as people may be running games and might need to use it as
> a reference.
>
> That's what they're for.
>
> Jim.
>
>
> -- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz --
>
>


-- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz --
SubjectRe: [dq] Which Rune version for rulebook?
Fromraro002@ec.auckland.ac.nz
DateFri, 24 Mar 2006 13:28:23 +1200
Quoting Errol Cavit <ecavit@tollnz.co.nz>:
> So you prefer the option I raised in my post to put the current playtest
> version in?

Yes

Jim


-- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz --
SubjectRe: [dq] Which Rune version for rulebook?
FromStruan Judd
DateFri, 24 Mar 2006 13:30:40 +1200
I also vote yes!

On 3/24/06, raro002@ec.auckland.ac.nz <raro002@ec.auckland.ac.nz> wrote:
> Quoting Errol Cavit <ecavit@tollnz.co.nz>:
> > So you prefer the option I raised in my post to put the current playtest
> > version in?
>
> Yes
>
> Jim
>
>
> -- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz --
>


-- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz --
Subject[dq] Rune 2.1.5
FromJonathan Bean - TME
DateFri, 24 Mar 2006 13:30:31 +1200
Hi all,

Sometime we will get Rune 2.1.5 on the wiki but for the moment its a
external link from the wiki to a PDF document.
Here is the URL if you are interested:
http://www.dragonquest.org.nz/dqwiki/index.php/Rune

Kind regards,

Jonathan Bean
Business Development Manager
TME -it's all about time
NZ Toll Free 0800 55 33 66
Aust Toll Free 1800 30 51 75
021 173 4060 www.tme.co.nz


-- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz --
SubjectRe: [dq] Which Rune version for rulebook?
FromJonathan Bean - TME
DateFri, 24 Mar 2006 13:23:07 +1200
I would like to have the most up to date version in the Rulebook.
I think version 2.1.5 is ready for 'general play test'. Yes I feel it is not
a great college but it fix's most (but not all) of the current issues with
Rune. I feel it is better that Rune 1.0 or 1.1 and 2.1.4

I want the Rule Book to have a version of Rune in it not just a placeholder
pointing to the DQ Wiki.

I want to be able to read a Rulebook away from the evils of a PC after 10
hours working on a PC at work, without having to print anything extra or
download something. Also I hate trees.

Jono

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dq-owner@dq.sf.org.nz [mailto:dq-owner@dq.sf.org.nz]On Behalf Of
> raro002@ec.auckland.ac.nz
> Sent: Friday, 24 March 2006 1:13 p.m.
> To: dq@dq.sf.org.nz
> Subject: Re: [dq] Which Rune version for rulebook?
>
>
> Quoting Errol Cavit <ecavit@tollnz.co.nz>:
>
> > So, does anyone have an objection to just having a placeholder
> for Rune in
> > the Rulebook?
>
>
> Yes, I do. I see no reason to put a placeholding into the
> rulebook for Rune,
> seeing as people may be running games and might need to use it as
> a reference.
>
> That's what they're for.
>
> Jim.
>
>
> -- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz --
>
>


-- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz --
SubjectRe: [dq] Which Rune version for rulebook?
FromHelen Saggers
DateFri, 24 Mar 2006 19:24:14 +1200
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0085_01C64F78.897B5930
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

RE: [dq] Which Rune version for rulebook?I'm with Jono.
The whole point of the voted new paragraph saying old rune was under =
review was to allow players to play one, a place holder in the rule book =
doesn't encourage this.
A copy of 2.1.5 and an its in playtest and may/will change statement is =
better.

Helen

------=_NextPart_000_0085_01C64F78.897B5930
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>RE: [dq] Which Rune version for rulebook?</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1528" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I'm with Jono.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>The whole point of the voted new =
paragraph saying=20
old rune was under review was to allow players to play one, a place =
holder in=20
the rule book doesn't encourage this.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>A copy of 2.1.5 and an its in playtest =
and may/will=20
change statement is better.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Helen</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: =
0px">&nbsp;</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0085_01C64F78.897B5930--


-- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz --
SubjectRe: [dq] Which Rune version for rulebook?
FromHelen Saggers
DateFri, 24 Mar 2006 19:24:14 +1200
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0085_01C64F78.897B5930
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

RE: [dq] Which Rune version for rulebook?I'm with Jono.
The whole point of the voted new paragraph saying old rune was under =
review was to allow players to play one, a place holder in the rule book =
doesn't encourage this.
A copy of 2.1.5 and an its in playtest and may/will change statement is =
better.

Helen

------=_NextPart_000_0085_01C64F78.897B5930
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>RE: [dq] Which Rune version for rulebook?</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1528" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I'm with Jono.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>The whole point of the voted new =
paragraph saying=20
old rune was under review was to allow players to play one, a place =
holder in=20
the rule book doesn't encourage this.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>A copy of 2.1.5 and an its in playtest =
and may/will=20
change statement is better.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Helen</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: =
0px">&nbsp;</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0085_01C64F78.897B5930--


-- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz --