| Subject | Re: [dq] Black hat poll |
|---|---|
| From | Martin Dickson |
| Date | Mon, 10 Apr 2006 08:28:23 +1200 |
------=_Part_2005_6027687.1144614503158 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On 4/9/06, William Dymock <dworkin@ihug.co.nz> wrote: > > Who actually in the guild is a black hat and active? Self-professed? Or will popular vote suffice? Also how black a hat? Do they have to consort with demons, possess summer homes in hell, bear infernal offspring, and despoil angelic beings, or do casual killers qualify? Cheers, Martin ------=_Part_2005_6027687.1144614503158 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On 4/9/06, <b class=3D"gmail_sendername">William Dymock</b> <<a href=3D"= mailto:dworkin@ihug.co.nz">dworkin@ihug.co.nz</a>> wrote:<div><span clas= s=3D"gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-= left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left= : 1ex;"> Who actually in the guild is a black hat and active?</blockquote><div><br>S= elf-professed? Or will popular vote suffice?<br><br>Also how black a hat? &= nbsp; Do they have to consort with demons, possess summer homes in hell, be= ar infernal offspring, and despoil angelic beings, or do casual killers qua= lify? <br><br>Cheers,<br>Martin<br></div></div><br> ------=_Part_2005_6027687.1144614503158-- -- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz -- | |
| Subject | Re: [dq] Black hat poll |
|---|---|
| From | Jonathan Bean - TME |
| Date | Mon, 10 Apr 2006 08:43:16 +1200 |
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_003B_01C65C7A.CF7B5610
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
How about anyone with a Hat - that is pritty clear line.
I have Lath who is pacted and active.
Jono
-----Original Message-----
From: dq-owner@dq.sf.org.nz [mailto:dq-owner@dq.sf.org.nz]On Behalf Of
Martin Dickson
Sent: Monday, 10 April 2006 8:28 a.m.
To: dq@dq.sf.org.nz
Subject: Re: [dq] Black hat poll
On 4/9/06, William Dymock <dworkin@ihug.co.nz> wrote:
Who actually in the guild is a black hat and active?
Self-professed? Or will popular vote suffice?
Also how black a hat? Do they have to consort with demons, possess
summer homes in hell, bear infernal offspring, and despoil angelic beings,
or do casual killers qualify?
Cheers,
Martin
------=_NextPart_000_003B_01C65C7A.CF7B5610
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1528" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D235334220-09042006><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
size=3D2>How=20
about anyone with a Hat - that is pritty clear line.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D235334220-09042006><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
size=3D2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D235334220-09042006><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
size=3D2>I have=20
Lath who is pacted and active.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D235334220-09042006><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
size=3D2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D235334220-09042006><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
size=3D2>Jono</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px =
solid">
<DIV class=3DOutlookMessageHeader dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><FONT =
face=3DTahoma=20
size=3D2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> =
dq-owner@dq.sf.org.nz=20
[mailto:dq-owner@dq.sf.org.nz]<B>On Behalf Of </B>Martin=20
Dickson<BR><B>Sent:</B> Monday, 10 April 2006 8:28 a.m.<BR><B>To:</B>=20
dq@dq.sf.org.nz<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [dq] Black hat=20
poll<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>On 4/9/06, <B =
class=3Dgmail_sendername>William=20
Dymock</B> <<A =
href=3D"mailto:dworkin@ihug.co.nz">dworkin@ihug.co.nz</A>>=20
wrote:
<DIV><SPAN class=3Dgmail_quote></SPAN>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=3Dgmail_quote=20
style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: =
rgb(204,204,204) 1px solid">Who=20
actually in the guild is a black hat and active?</BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV><BR>Self-professed? Or will popular vote suffice?<BR><BR>Also how =
black a=20
hat? Do they have to consort with demons, possess summer homes =
in hell,=20
bear infernal offspring, and despoil angelic beings, or do casual =
killers=20
qualify?=20
<BR><BR>Cheers,<BR>Martin<BR></DIV></DIV><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_003B_01C65C7A.CF7B5610--
-- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz --
| |
| Subject | Re: [dq] Black hat poll |
|---|---|
| From | Mandos Mitchinson |
| Date | Mon, 10 Apr 2006 08:51:29 +1200 |
> Who actually in the guild is a black hat and active? I would consider it more of a smudgy grey hat, but Dramus is Pacted and active. Mandos /s -- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz -- | |
| Subject | [dq] Scribe Note Library and the Wiki |
|---|---|
| From | Keith Smith |
| Date | Mon, 10 Apr 2006 09:06:28 +1200 |
I've been adding the links from the Library site to completed scribe notes in the Wiki (they're listed in green). Going into the Wiki is not a problem but, using the browser's back button to get back to the library site causes a 'bounce back;' to the Wiki. I believe this is caused by an invisible page stop on the way in, probably for security reasons, so to get back, you have to go back two hops. On Firefox, this is done by the pulldown arrow next to the back arrow and selecting the second most recent page visited. I presume IE has a similar mechanism. Keith -- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz -- | |
| Subject | Re: [dq] Scribe Note Library and the Wiki |
|---|---|
| From | Stephen Martin |
| Date | Mon, 10 Apr 2006 09:27:21 +1200 (NZST) |
If you want assistance or diagnosis of this you will need to be a little more specific. To start with, what URL are you starting from and what URL are you going to? But if you are updating one web site from another, why not have two tabs or two browsers open and just switch between them, it will generally be much faster. Cheers, Stephen. Keith Smith said: > I've been adding the links from the Library site to completed scribe notes in the Wiki (they're > listed in green). Going into the Wiki is not a problem but, using the browser's back button to > get back to the library site causes a 'bounce back;' to the Wiki. > > I believe this is caused by an invisible page stop on the way in, probably for security > reasons, so to get back, you have to go back two hops. On Firefox, this is done by the pulldown > arrow next to the back arrow and selecting the second most recent page visited. I > presume IE has a similar mechanism. > > Keith > > > -- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz -- -- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz -- | |
| Subject | Re: [dq] Black hat poll |
|---|---|
| From | Zane Mendoza |
| Date | Sun, 9 Apr 2006 14:31:44 -0700 (PDT) |
I have Bainbridge who isn't pacted but she has multiple demon tainted things about her, and I doubt it is going to be much longer before she does pact. --- Mandos Mitchinson <MandosM@adhb.govt.nz> wrote: > > Who actually in the guild is a black hat and > active? > > I would consider it more of a smudgy grey hat, but > Dramus is Pacted and > active. > > Mandos > /s > > > -- to unsubscribe notify > mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz -- > "...Sometimes the slower people think you are, the more surprised they're going to be when you win the race..." __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz -- | |
| Subject | Re: [dq] Black hat poll |
|---|---|
| From | Chris Caulfield |
| Date | Mon, 10 Apr 2006 09:32:56 +1200 |
------=_Part_2446_7872767.1144618376507 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Its an inclination / alignment more than anything but; - Dalran is pacted and Active - Broc is aligned / pacted and Active Regards, Chris On 4/10/06, Mandos Mitchinson <MandosM@adhb.govt.nz> wrote: > > > Who actually in the guild is a black hat and active? > > I would consider it more of a smudgy grey hat, but Dramus is Pacted and > active. > > Mandos > /s > > > -- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz -- > ------=_Part_2446_7872767.1144618376507 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline <div>Its an inclination / alignment more than anything but;</div> <div>- Dalran is pacted and Active</div> <div>- Broc is aligned / pacted and Active<br>Regards, Chris<br> </div= > <div><span class=3D"gmail_quote">On 4/10/06, <b class=3D"gmail_sendername">= Mandos Mitchinson</b> <<a href=3D"mailto:MandosM@adhb.govt.nz">MandosM@a= dhb.govt.nz</a>> wrote:</span> <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0= px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">> Who actually in the guild i= s a black hat and active?<br><br>I would consider it more of a smudgy grey = hat, but Dramus is Pacted and <br>active.<br><br>Mandos<br>/s<br><br><br>-- to unsubscribe notify mailto:= <a href=3D"mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz">dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz</a> --<b= r></blockquote></div><br> ------=_Part_2446_7872767.1144618376507-- -- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz -- | |
| Subject | Re: [dq] Black hat poll |
|---|---|
| From | dworkin@ihug.co.nz |
| Date | Mon, 10 Apr 2006 10:48:52 +1200 |
C'mon people. Would you rather work for the marauding orcs or the townsfolk? It's not complicated. Are you a bad guy? When you get down to it are you one of those people the Guild turns a convienient blind eye to. I'm not interested in amoral oppotunists or pacted status. Who is evil? Meta-discussions often turn to the subject of evil, 'black-hat' PCs. Well, who are they? Aside from some notorious villians (Arnaud and Vivian) who else qualifies? This is written because I'm wondering if there is demand for 'villian games', ones that the some part of the guild beureaucracy keeps quiet because of some reason. William -- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz -- | |
| Subject | Re: [dq] Black hat poll |
|---|---|
| From | Mandos Mitchinson |
| Date | Mon, 10 Apr 2006 11:14:59 +1200 |
> It's not complicated. Are you a bad guy? When you get down > to it are you one of those people the Guild turns a > convienient blind eye to. > > I'm not interested in amoral oppotunists or pacted status. > Who is evil? Then perhaps you should have asked that instead of requesting millinerary details. The last villians game I ran had Morgan Sardak Ughbash and a fourth I cannot recollect. People who are activly trying to be Evil (with varying degree's of success). Viola Vivian Scorpion Armond Those who don't have any moral qualms about performing evil tasks but are not actually trying to be Evil. Tussock - (So long as it isn't slaving) Faith That's a few off the top of my head. Mandos /s -- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz -- | |
| Subject | [dq] DQ: turning a blind eye |
|---|---|
| From | Jonathan Bean - TME |
| Date | Mon, 10 Apr 2006 14:18:54 +1200 |
Well... 95% of Guild members HAVE to turn a convienient blind eye. It's the nature of the Seagate Advanturers Guild that the good characters have to turn a blind eye as the evil characters are often guild members. We are forced into a situation which was designed to control people/players so that everyone got along nicely. Having an 'in game' orginsation which puts characters together who would normaly be at odds, is hard on all character. Players often have to come up with something as to why their character do not seeing something or turning a blind eye etc so we can all get along. Its the nature of having the controls placed at the character level not the player/person level. Kind regards, Jonathan Bean Business Development Manager TME -it's all about time NZ Toll Free 0800 55 33 66 Aust Toll Free 1800 30 51 75 021 173 4060 www.tme.co.nz > -----Original Message----- > From: dq-owner@dq.sf.org.nz [mailto:dq-owner@dq.sf.org.nz]On Behalf Of > dworkin@ihug.co.nz > Sent: Monday, 10 April 2006 10:49 a.m. > To: dq@dq.sf.org.nz > Subject: Re: [dq] Black hat poll > > > C'mon people. Would you rather work for the marauding orcs > or the townsfolk? > > It's not complicated. Are you a bad guy? When you get down > to it are you one of those people the Guild turns a > convienient blind eye to. > > I'm not interested in amoral oppotunists or pacted status. > Who is evil? > > Meta-discussions often turn to the subject of evil, > 'black-hat' PCs. Well, who are they? Aside from some > notorious villians (Arnaud and Vivian) who else qualifies? > > This is written because I'm wondering if there is demand for > 'villian games', ones that the some part of the guild > beureaucracy keeps quiet because of some reason. > > William > > > -- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz -- > -- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz -- | |
| Subject | Re: [dq] Black hat poll |
|---|---|
| From | Michael Scott |
| Date | Mon, 10 Apr 2006 15:53:12 +1200 |
>From: William Dymock <dworkin@ihug.co.nz> >Who actually in the guild is a black hat and active? > >William >-- Human the Fool and MDK are two practical souls who would do anything for the right price, be it money or idervidual power. Serra Angelus just dosn't give a shit as long as she isn't bored, though she only works in a support capacity. TTFN Michael _________________________________________________________________ Looking for love? Check out XtraMSN Personals http://xtramsn.match.com/match/mt.cfm?pg=channel&tcid=200731 -- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz -- | |