------=_Part_4840_23177767.1209335080672
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Michael Woodhams <mdw@free.net.nz> wrote:

> The size increment could be by length, mass, volume or percentage of body
> mass/length. (Should it take twice as long to regenerate a giant's leg
> compared to a human's?)


Do giants take twice as long to heal normal wounds compared to a human?  If
a human and a giant (and a halfling to further illustrate) each get a wicked
slash the length of their forearm that has to heal naturally does the
halfling heal faster than the human, and the human faster than giant because
their arms are shorter? No?  Then why would regeneration have a size
variance factor?

Cheers,
Martin

------=_Part_4840_23177767.1209335080672
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Michael Woodhams &lt;<a href="mailto:mdw@free.net.nz">mdw@free.net.nz</a>&gt; wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
The size increment could be by length, mass, volume or percentage of body mass/length. (Should it take twice as long to regenerate a giant&#39;s leg compared to a human&#39;s?)</blockquote><div><br>Do giants take twice as long to heal normal wounds compared to a human?&nbsp; If a human and a giant (and a halfling to further illustrate) each get a wicked slash the length of their forearm that has to heal naturally does the halfling heal faster than the human, and the human faster than giant because their arms are shorter? No?&nbsp; Then why would regeneration have a size variance factor?<br>
<br>Cheers,<br>Martin<br></div></div><br>

------=_Part_4840_23177767.1209335080672--


-- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz --