This is a reminder that there is only one week left until the Guild 
Meeting, so could you please get your articles etc to us as soon as 
possible, i.e. before the previous day.

We're looking for the usual:
	News
	Articles
	Rumours
	What's Hot, What's Not
	Quotes

Please either email them here, or post them in the editorial room on the wiki.

Thank you

Seagate Times Editors


-- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-announce-request@dq.sf.org.nz --

If a warrior has spent EP to rank a weapon in a category that they already
have a higher rank in, but the rank does not exceed the minimum of half
their warrior rank or half their max weapon rank in that category, what
rank are they actually wielding that weapon at?

Their actual rank? Or the rank as determined by the warrior skill?

Personally I think it would be the latter until they have ranked that
weapon up to exceed the derived value but I'm curious to find out what
other GMs think

Keith


-- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz --

I always use the better of actual rank or effective rank from warrior.

Cheers, Stephen.

phaeton@ihug.co.nz wrote:
> If a warrior has spent EP to rank a weapon in a category that they already
> have a higher rank in, but the rank does not exceed the minimum of half
> their warrior rank or half their max weapon rank in that category, what
> rank are they actually wielding that weapon at?
>
> Their actual rank? Or the rank as determined by the warrior skill?
>
> Personally I think it would be the latter until they have ranked that
> weapon up to exceed the derived value but I'm curious to find out what
> other GMs think
>
> Keith


-- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz --

--000e0cd4d1aa3b61f3046ba8730f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I went to DQ last night. Played a Kalrathi (a catman) acrobat and had fun
being fast and agile.

On 6/6/09, phaeton@ihug.co.nz <phaeton@ihug.co.nz> wrote:
>
> If a warrior has spent EP to rank a weapon in a category that they already
> have a higher rank in, but the rank does not exceed the minimum of half
> their warrior rank or half their max weapon rank in that category, what
> rank are they actually wielding that weapon at?
>
> Their actual rank? Or the rank as determined by the warrior skill?
>
> Personally I think it would be the latter until they have ranked that
> weapon up to exceed the derived value but I'm curious to find out what
> other GMs think
>
> Keith
>
>
> -- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz --
>

--000e0cd4d1aa3b61f3046ba8730f
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I went to DQ last night. Played a Kalrathi (a catman) acrobat and had fun b=
eing fast and agile.<br><br>
<div><span class=3D"gmail_quote">On 6/6/09, <b class=3D"gmail_sendername"><=
a href=3D"mailto:phaeton@ihug.co.nz">phaeton@ihug.co.nz</a></b> &lt;<a href=
=3D"mailto:phaeton@ihug.co.nz">phaeton@ihug.co.nz</a>&gt; wrote:</span>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0=
px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">If a warrior has spent EP to ran=
k a weapon in a category that they already<br>have a higher rank in, but th=
e rank does not exceed the minimum of half<br>
their warrior rank or half their max weapon rank in that category, what<br>=
rank are they actually wielding that weapon at?<br><br>Their actual rank? O=
r the rank as determined by the warrior skill?<br><br>Personally I think it=
 would be the latter until they have ranked that<br>
weapon up to exceed the derived value but I&#39;m curious to find out what<=
br>other GMs think<br><br>Keith<br><br><br>-- to unsubscribe notify mailto:=
<a href=3D"mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz">dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz</a> --<b=
r>
</blockquote></div><br>

--000e0cd4d1aa3b61f3046ba8730f--


-- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz --

After seeing the latest from the campaign committee that was posted on the
Wiki, I have a question for them.

Does it snow on Seagate? And do any other parts of Carzala get snow?

Keith


-- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz --

I always use the better of actual rank or effective rank from warrior where 
I have more than one weapon in a category.

Helen

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Stephen Martin" <stephenm@aklnz.net>
To: <dq@dq.sf.org.nz>
Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2009 4:32 PM
Subject: Re: [dq] Warrior rules clarification


I always use the better of actual rank or effective rank from warrior.

Cheers, Stephen.

phaeton@ihug.co.nz wrote:
> If a warrior has spent EP to rank a weapon in a category that they already
> have a higher rank in, but the rank does not exceed the minimum of half
> their warrior rank or half their max weapon rank in that category, what
> rank are they actually wielding that weapon at?
>
> Their actual rank? Or the rank as determined by the warrior skill?
>
> Personally I think it would be the latter until they have ranked that
> weapon up to exceed the derived value but I'm curious to find out what
> other GMs think
>
> Keith


-- to unsubscribe notify mailto:dq-request@dq.sf.org.nz --